Dr. Milo T. Pinkerton III ([info]doctorpinkerton) wrote,
@ 2009-06-06 21:40:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current music:Black Math Experiment - 'Ology'

My response to the previous...
Thanks for all the good wishes everyone! I'm not taking this lying down. Here's my response to the letter from the city (see previous post.)





Dear sirs,

Having read the letter of complaint dated June 2, 2009, I have the following comments:

I have never resisted when asked to lower the volume of music at my home. However, it has been three years since a policeman visited to request the cessation of noise. The insulation in my home and garage walls is sufficient to keep my immediate neighbors from being bothered (yes, I asked.) Additionally, I have not been practicing music on a 'weekend' as described in the letter. My rehearsals have been confined to Monday nights between 7:30pm and 9:30pm. Perhaps the radio by my right-hand neighbor's poolside, or the other band which sometimes rehearses further up Huntly St. led to this confusion. But weekend disturbances were not my doing, and I resent being scapegoated.

A 'maximum permissible sound level' is mentioned but not delineated. What is the maximum sound pressure level permitted for the 'receiving land use category in Table 1'? As an audio hobbyist, I am very aware of the scientific measurement of sound pressure levels and can easily keep within permissible limits - if they are specified.

Please furnish me with figures to help me to comply with your request in a reasonable manner. Flatly telling me that I cannot practice music in my own home is NOT reasonable! Zoning doesn't dictate what I can or cannot do in the privacy of my home, especially given that music is a hobby to me, not a business. However, I am sensitive to noise complaints, would like to be a 'good neighbor' and am certainly willing to comply with the limits of the law, if you furnish the proper information on those limits.

P.S.: I did not receive any 'letter dated May 8, 2009' regarding this matter. To which address was that letter sent?

Regards,

etc.






My brother-in-law, who is an attorney, has told me that the letter was proper and respectful, BUT to wait to mail it until he has a word with a couple people... more news on this as it develops...



(Read 10 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]wildcard9
2009-06-07 03:43 am UTC (link)
Good responce, and I am glad you ran it by your brother in law before sending it. Please keep us informed on what is happening. It is possible that another house was the target of the complaint, not you.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]doctorpinkerton
2009-06-07 05:54 am UTC (link)
I think it's several things, including my own transgressions, being lumped on me. Yes, we do rehearse on Monday nights and occasionally we do get carried away, SPL-wise. At the same time, I refuse to simply roll over & take the blame for everything mentioned in the letter, as it wasn't all my doing!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

loopholes
(Anonymous)
2009-06-07 10:41 pm UTC (link)
A few years ago I got popped for having a fire pit on my lawn, turns out you can have a fire as long as you're using it to cook something, so i've been barbecuing the same hotdog every saturday since 2007, and the cops leave me alone. Maybe some similar loophole could be found for COG practice. Also this may be partially my fault, I was testing a spray that repels buerecrats and roaches the other day and it may have driven a few south, If the ones plaguing you are of the NY variety (you can tell by the necktie) let me know and I'll send you a trap. Prof M.W. Barnhouse

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Read 10 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…